Just because everyone is capable of these things does not mean that everyone will do them. Virtue is a disposition concerned with choice. The other components of the soul are not variable in the same way.
It will most likely be said that she is brave and that she did what was right given the situation. Everyone is capable of getting drunk, driving a car, and causing an accident. Even if someone has a thought or feelings about driving drunk, they cannot be held accountable for the thought and feelings if they do not act on them.
Because dispositions are variable, we must make certain decisions in given situations that we would Aristotle and virtue essay make in other situations. He uses this concept to explain the thesis: Most American men have a disposition to wear pants.
An argument against the thesis is that some actions are morally wrong on every level. However, the thesis cannot be understood without an understanding of what exactly a disposition is.
How virtuous a person is determines how they will behave in a given situation. After reading Nicomachean Ethics I thought more about the topic and considered many examples of when "bad" behaviors are the right thing to do or the only choice. This enforces the thesis that virtue is a disposition because a virtuous person will theoretically make the right choice in any situation.
Men could wear dresses if they wanted to, and they are physically able to do so, but most men choose not to. In the example, the drunken person acted on the desire to drive and created an unfavorable situation.
I personally believe that there are actions that in most cases are wrong. It is not considered virtuous to drink and drive, meaning that a bad character trait is expressed by a drunk driver. The individual cannot be held accountable for the desire to drive, only for acting on the desire. Like many Greeks, Aristotle did not believe in the existence of inherently bad behaviors.
Murder, adultery, and stealing are all bad behaviors.
Since we are all capable of basically the same things, but we do not all fulfill these capacities we cannot be held accountable for them. A behavior cannot be either good or evil, but a person can have good or bad character traits. Virtue is a character trait, and character traits are part of an individual.Aristotle on Virtue essaysAristotle defines virtue as acquiring excellence through the fulfillment of a particular function.
Stating that all people are born with the potential to be virtuous yet they must act accordingly through their function. Any function good and well must possess a telos or e. Aristotle says that virtues are something that we acquire and are not just born with; people are not intrinsically good or bad, but become good or bad according to their habits they develop throughout their lives.
Open Document. Essay on Virtue Ethics. Aristotle was a great philosopher during the forth century B. Throughout his article "Virtue Ethics", he concentrates upon the concepts of virtue and happiness. "happiness is an activity of soul in accordance with perfect virtue(p.
)." Both virtue and happiness are related to one another, for /5(16). - Aristotle's ethics consist of a form of virtue ethics, in which the ethical action is that which properly complies with virtue(s) by finding the mean within each particular one.
Aristotle outlines two types of virtues: moral/character virtues and intellectual virtues. Aristotle's Theory of Ehtical Virtue Aristotle said that all people are composed of a combination of vice (bad character traits) and virtue (good character traits).
He uses this concept to explain the thesis: Virtue is a disposition concerned with choice. This essay was written by a student in Theodore Gracyk's Philosophy course. Free Essay: Aristotle's ethics consist of a form of virtue ethics, in which the ethical action is that which properly complies with virtue(s) by finding the.Download