The writer has omitted pertinent content or content runs-on excessively. The paper is about a specific topic but the writer has not established a position.
Fewer than 5 current sources, or fewer than 2 of 5 are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books.
Grading rubrics can be of great benefit to both you and your students. Topic focus The topic is focused narrowly enough for the scope of this assignment.
Sources include both general background sources and specialized sources. The explicitness of the expectations helps students know exactly why they lost points on the assignment and aids them in setting goals for future improvement.
The writer provides concluding remarks that show analysis and synthesis of ideas. Paper does not flow and appears to be created from disparate issues. The topic is not clearly defined.
Special-interest sources and popular literature are acknowledged as such if they are cited. After you and your students have used the rubric, have them work in groups to make suggested alterations to the rubric to more precisely match their needs or the parameters of a particular writing assignment.
This increases their level of awareness of the traits that distinguish successful essays from those that fail to meet the criteria. Does not cite sources. A thesis statement provides direction for the paper, either by statement of a position or hypothesis. Headings are necessary to link concepts.
Specific criteria are explicitly stated, facilitating the grading process and increasing your objectivity. All web sites utilized are authoritative.
Sources More than 5 current sources, of which at least 3 are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books.
For the most part, ties together information from all sources. The topic is too broad for the scope of this assignment.Oral presentation content aligns with project topic. 2; 2. Content of paper is thoroughly addressed & main issues of project are well covered.
2; 3. Multiple disciplines of ocean sciences & socio-economic issues are considered. Research Project Oral Presentation Rubric.
Team & School name: **Each team has 20 minutes to state their case or. Research Paper Grading Rubric Name: Course: Date: (The Psychology Department at San José State University is acknowledged for the basic structure of this form.). Research Paper Rubric Name: _____ Date: _____ Score: _____ Category Exceeds Standard Meets Standard Nearly Meets Standard Does Not Meet Standard No Evidence Score Title Page Title Your Name, Teacher’s Name, Course Period, Date, Neatly finished-no errors Evidence of four Evidence of 3 Evidence of 2 or less Absent.
Writing: High school style rubric 1 & 2; CCSS Lesson/Unit review rubrics. Engage NY ELA Evaluation Rubric; Engage NY Math Evaluation Rubric; Research paper grading rubric; Research project rubric: Elementary; Research project rubric: Middle; Research project rubric: Secondary Reflection assessment rubric.
Research Paper Rubric (A) (B) (C) (D) (F) Thesis clearly stated and appropriately focused clearly stated but focus could have been sharper thesis phrasing too simple.
Timberlane Regional High School Research Rubric for Student Work Modified: January, 1 —Novice 2 Developing 3 Effective 4 Advanced within the entire paper/project. • Student weaves together print and non-print sources throughout Research Rubric Revised docx.Download